Why this trading model works differently by design
The focus is not on the return alone — but on the question of how the system behind SONIC AI and CopyX is constructed. Three questions decide whether a trading model is sound:
01
Where do the profits come from?
02
Who carries the risk?
03
Do the broker, traders, liquidity provider, users and community share the same interests?
Source of returns
Where do the returns come from?
The returns come from genuinely executed trades — with the Sonic strategy, from trading gold (XAU/USD). SONIC analyses the market, opens positions and closes them on the corresponding profit or loss signals.
Market
Gold (XAU/USD)
SONIC
analyses, opens & closes positions
CopyX
protected technical execution & scaling
Community accounts
Strategy is copied 1:1
The profits come from actual market movements — not from new deposits by users. The return comes from trading performance. CopyX itself does not generate any profits; it provides the protected technical execution and scaling.
Protection mechanism
The “white wall” — positions stay invisible
A particularly important protection mechanism: for outsiders, the running SONIC positions are not visible in real time. From the opening of a position to its close there is, figuratively speaking, a “white wall” towards the outside world.
SONIC position● Live
InstrumentXAU/USD
DirectionBUY ↑
Entry4.326,97
Volume••••••
Stop-Loss••••••
Take-Profit••••••
White wall
While the trade is running, nothing can be seen from the outside.
Trade closed — now visible
Entry, direction, volume, stop-loss and take-profit cannot be seen by outsiders.
The complete trade information becomes visible only after the trade has been closed — never earlier.
This means other market participants cannot simply copy the SONIC strategy.
It becomes harder to build up targeted counter-positions against running SONIC trades.
Nobody outside the protected system should be able to tell what SONIC is currently trading.
The executing venues and liquidity providers of course have to process the information required for real order execution. The “white wall” refers to the shielding from uninvolved outsiders and other users.
Trading liquidity
The amplifier — more liquidity, controlled leverage
The additional amplifier makes greater trading liquidity available. From 1.000 USD of user capital, for example, 12.000 or 24.000 USD of trading liquidity can arise.
Example: 1.000 USD of user capital
1.000 USD trading liquidity
Deposit
1.000 $
Amplifier 12x
12.000 $
Amplifier 24x
24.000 $
More trading liquidity also means a higher economic risk.
The amplifier can magnify profits — but it can also make losses relevant more quickly. That is exactly why the risk is capped centrally: with the 24x amplifier there is a firmly set drawdown limit of no more than 5 % — the individual user cannot set the strategy to be more aggressive on their own initiative.
Professional trading strategy
Protected positioning that is not publicly visible
Additional trading liquidity
Controlled position size
Consistent risk management
Technical scaling via CopyX
Broker model
The decisive difference: A-Book and B-Book
How a broker processes the positions of its users determines whether broker and user have the same interests — or stand on opposite sides.
Classic B-Book model
The order stays in-house
Positions are first booked internally and are not necessarily passed on in full to the real market or to an external liquidity provider. If the user loses, that loss can become revenue for the broker in economic terms. If the user wins, the broker takes on an obligation towards the user.
Possible conflict of interest: The user wants to win — the broker can benefit economically if the user loses. That does not automatically mean that every B-Book broker trades against its users. The model does, however, fundamentally create a possible economic conflict of interest.
A-Book model of our broker
The order goes to the market
The broker we use works according to the A-Book model: positions are passed on to external liquidity sources or to the market. In principle, the broker therefore does not earn from the loss of the user, but among other things through:
spreads and trading commissions
the trading volume actually executed
long-term active and successful users
the growth of the Active Balance
the use of the entire ecosystem
This shifts the economic interest: it is not the quick loss of a user that is attractive, but long-term activity and lasting trading volume.
Client fund protection
Additional insurance on client funds
A question that comes up often in our conversations: what actually happens to the money if something goes wrong at the broker itself? According to the broker there is an additional insurance on client funds for exactly that case — no opt-in is required and there are no extra costs. The following details come from the broker; we pass them on unchanged.
Insurance cover
US$1,000,000 per claimant — that is per client
The sum applies per claimant — the certificate defines it as the net loss of “any one Claimant”, that is per client.
It covers the available balance and open CFD positions.
The protection applies automatically to all clients — no opt-in, no extra costs.
It is triggered only in the unlikely event of insolvency of the broker.
It comes on top of the other protection mechanisms of the trading model.
Important context: this is no protection against trading losses. The market risk remains entirely yours — the insurance only concerns the broker becoming insolvent.
Details provided by the broker, not verified by us. The policy is issued through an insurance broker authorised and regulated by the FCA in the United Kingdom; the currently published certificate runs from 29 April 2026 to 28 April 2027 and additionally states the limit as an aggregate shared with another group entity. Only the terms of the insurer and the broker in their currently valid version are authoritative — we recommend reading them yourself before opening an account.
Aligned interests
Why everyone involved works in the same direction
What makes the system special is the economic link between everyone involved — already visible in the distribution of the profits generated:
Distribution of the profits generated
70 %
25 %
5 %
User Community SONIC traders
The user 70 %
Receives 70 % of the profits generated. The interest here: profitable trading with risk kept as controlled as possible.
The SONIC traders 5 %
Receive a 5 % profit share — they only earn if profits are actually generated. In their own interest: protect the strategy over the long term, keep drawdowns under control and not let the trading volume grow beyond the available capacity.
The community 25 %
25 % of the profit is distributed within the community — plus lot commission and, where applicable, CPA payments. The community benefits from profitable, long-term active users, a growing Active Balance, increasing trading volume, the compounding of profits and sustainable support.
The broker
The broker benefits from trading volume and permanently active accounts. A user who loses their capital quickly produces no further trading volume afterwards.
The liquidity provider
Provides market liquidity and additional trading capacity. For the liquidity provider, too, a
controlled system is decisive — uncontrolled losses and an overloading of the strategy could put the funding at risk.
The shared direction
Everyone benefits most when trading is controlled, sustainable and successful over the long term. That is exactly where this system differs from a pure B-Book model, in which the loss of the user can directly become the profit of the broker.
Risk management
Why risk management is so important
The high trading capacity only works if the risk is capped centrally and controlled consistently at all times. Fixed limits apply:
12x
Amplifier
max. 10 % drawdown
24x
Amplifier
max. 5 % drawdown
The individual user cannot set the strategy to be more aggressive on their own initiative. This prevents emotional intervention, greed, uncontrolled averaging down and individual over-leveraging.
CopyX additionally protects the trading strategy
The positions are transferred technically.
Running trades remain shielded from outsiders.
Complete trade information is visible only after the close — never earlier.
The strategy cannot simply be copied by others.
Targeted counter-positions against identifiable SONIC trades are made harder.
The traders and their intellectual property are protected.
This security architecture combines central risk limits with shielded execution and a controlled scaling of the trading volume.
Capacity limit
Why SONIC is capped at three billion USD
A successful trading strategy cannot be scaled without limit. That is why the volume under management is deliberately capped:
Volume under management — deliberate upper limit
0,0 bn USD cap
CAP · 3 bn USD
Above this limit no additional volume is taken on — so that execution quality and the return-risk profile are preserved.
The larger the volume under management, the harder it becomes:
to open positions without influencing the price
to execute all users at comparable prices
to obtain sufficient liquidity at the decisive moment
to limit slippage and spread widening
to close large positions again quickly
to maintain the return at unchanged risk
With gold and forex, global liquidity is very high. What matters, however, is not only the theoretical size of the overall market, but the liquidity concretely available for the particular instrument, the particular liquidity provider and the particular moment of execution.
The 3 bn limit as a capacity and risk limit
The system deliberately does not take on unlimited capital from users.
The cap protects the execution quality of the strategy.
It reduces the risk that the size of the system itself influences the market.
The available liquidity should be sufficient to open and close positions in a controlled way.
Return, risk and trading volume stay in a manageable ratio.
The cap is therefore not a drawback but a deliberately built-in protection mechanism against oversizing the system.
An honest look
Which risks remain nonetheless
No protection mechanism makes trading risk-free. Critical situations can arise, for example, through:
Extreme price jumps and so-called gaps
A lack of liquidity in exceptional market phases
Massive slippage
The failure of a liquidity provider
Technical faults at CopyX or at the trading platform
Faulty market or price data
Exceeding the capacity of the strategy
Operational, regulatory or counterparty risks
A trading strategy that stops working over the longer term
In a comprehensive market or liquidity collapse, several protection mechanisms could fail at once. That would be the largest conceivable scenario — but not the only possible risk.
The particular strength: the combination of the building blocks
Fixed drawdown limits
External liquidity
Real market execution
Shielded running positions
Protected CopyX technology
No individual increase of risk
Controlled volume limit
Aligned economic interests
The decisive conclusion
Economically, everyone is in the same boat
The essential difference from many classic broker models: the broker is
not dependent on the quick loss of its users. The system is geared towards long-term activity:
The User benefits from the trading profit.
The Traders receive a share of the profits generated.
The Community benefits from profit share and trading volume.
The Broker earns from active accounts and executed trades.
The Liquidity Provider benefits from a controlled, scalable trading model.
The “white wall” protects the running SONIC positions from being seen by outsiders. At the same time, the cap at three billion USD prevents the trading volume from growing larger than the capacity the strategy can reliably execute.
The strength lies in the combination
It is not a single building block that makes the system, but the combination: a protected trading strategy, controlled liquidity, clear risk limits, real market execution and economically aligned interests of everyone involved — sustainable trading volume through long-term active and successful users.
Note: This page reflects exclusively our own, real-life experiences and the personal understanding of the mySonic community regarding the trading model described. It serves as information so that anyone interested can form their own opinion — it is
not financial advice, not a recommendation and not a promise of returns. Trading involves considerable risk; a total loss of the deposit is possible in principle. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results.